منابع مشابه
Inconsistency-Tolerant Query Answering: Rationality Properties and Computational Complexity Analysis
Generalising the state of the art, an inconsistency-tolerant semantics can be seen as a couple composed of a modifier operator and an inference strategy. In this paper we deepen the analysis of such general setting and focus on two aspects. First, we investigate the rationality properties of such semantics for existential rule knowledge bases. Second, we unfold the broad landscape of complexity...
متن کاملParadox and Relativism
Since the time of Plato, relativism has been attacked as a self-refuting theory. Today, there are two basic kinds of argument that are used to show that global relativism is logically incoherent: first, a direct descendent of the argument Plato uses against Protagoras, called the peritrope; and, second, a more recent argument that relativism leads to an infinite regress. Although some relativis...
متن کاملIndexical Relativism versus Genuine Relativism
The main purpose of this paper is to characterize and compare two forms any relativist thesis can take: indexical relativism and genuine relativism. Indexical relativists claim that the implicit indexicality of certain sentences is the only source of relativity. Genuine relativists, by contrast, claim that there is relativity not just at the level of sentences, but also at propositional level. ...
متن کاملJurisprudence and Rationality
There are different concepts of rationality: specific rationality, normative rationality and instrumental rationality whose limitation covers the holistic rationality and represents the fate of rationality in the West. Thus following Hume reason became the slave of feelings and lost its authority for choosing the goal. In Islamic culture reason with its undeniable background in Shariah enjoy...
متن کاملRelativism: Protagoras and Nelson Goodman
پروتاگوراس در یونان باستان و نلسون گودمن در دورۀ جدید دو تن از برجستهترین مدافعان نسبیگرایی به شمار میروند. گاه ممکن است نثر آن دو فریبنده بنماید، و چه بسا این امر شرح و تفسیر منظور و مراد حقیقی آنها را دشوار سازد. پروتاگوراس و گودمن، با وجود برخی تفاوتها، به دفاع از این دیدگاه به ظاهر افراطی میپردازند که همه وقایع، به معنای حقیقی کلمه، وابسته به دیدگاه انسان است. هدف این مقاله شرح و بررسی ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Informal Logic
سال: 1995
ISSN: 0824-2577,0824-2577
DOI: 10.22329/il.v17i2.2415